Legal Opinion
New Amsterdam Cas. Co. v. W. D. Felder & Co., Inc
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided September 7, 1954No. 14772PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOPER, District Judge.
Appellee, W. D. Felder & Company, Inc. (also referred to as plaintiff and as the insured) brought suit against New Amsterdam Casualty Company, the appellant (also referred to as the insurer and as defendant) on a blanket fidelity bond protecting against losses of money or property by reason of dishonest acts of employees. It covered:
“that part of any inventory shortage which the insured shall conclusively prove has been caused by the fraud or dishonesty of any employee or employees.”
The case was tried to the Court without a jury, a verdict was rendered in favor of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Federal Surety Co. v. SmithTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Sun Mutual Insurance v. Mattingly & RicketsTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Sanders v. Aetna Life InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1947
- Gaytime Frock Co. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. People's Bank of SanfordCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. Cecil Dwayne Evans, Arnold Gene Tate, and Charles Edward Gent, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Jose Jimenez LopezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Corrected Opinion United States of America v. Lewis Miller Smyth, III and Glenn B. BavousettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- American Empire Insurance Company of South Dakota v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- H. M. (Mike) Myrick and Vernon Evans Bergman, A/K/A Soll Evans, Sol Evans and Sonny Evans v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.