Legal Opinion

Sun Mutual Insurance v. Mattingly & Rickets

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1890No. 6430PublishedCited by 43 opinions

Error from Grayson. Tried below before Hon. H. 0. Head.

1Opinion of the Court

GAINES, Associate Justice.

—This suit was brought on a policy of insurance executed by appellant to Henry & Dickerson on certain real and personal property. The appellees became the owners of the claim during the progress of the suit, and without objection made themselves parties plaintiff in the action and prosecuted it to judgment in their favor.

On the 29th of October, 1884, the insured property was destroyed by fire. The policy stipulated that "persons sustaining loss or damage by fire shall forthwith give notice thereof in writing to the company, and as soon thereafter as possible they…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tayloe v. Merchants' Fire Ins. Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  2. East Texas Fire Ins.v. CoffeeTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Harriman v. Queen Insurance Co. of LondonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  4. West Rockingham Mutual Fire Ins. v. Sheets & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1875

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Federal Surety Co. v. SmithTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. Southern Fire Insurance v. KnightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Burns v. American Nat. Ins.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  4. Continental Fire Insurance v. WhitakerTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  5. East Texas Fire Insurance v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1891

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API