Legal Opinion

Brookfield v. Novelty Glass Mfg. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey

Decided January 27, 1908PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. • On exceptions to master’s report.

1Opinion of the Court

RANKING, District Judge.

The bill of complaint in this case was filed in 1901 by William Brookfield as sole complainant. By it he alleged that he was the sole owner of two patents, Nos. 542,565 and 532,973, for improvements in presses for making glass insulators' for telegraph poles, etc., capable of conjoint use and actually conjointly used by him in one and the same machine, and that they were also so used by the defendant company in infringement of his rights. There was the usual prayer for an injunction and an accounting. On the hearing upon pleadings and proofs, Brookfield having died and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yale Lock Manufacturing Co. v. SargentSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Brookfield v. Novelty Glass Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1903
  3. Brookfield v. Elmer Glass WorksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1907
  4. Brookfield v. Elmer Glass WorksU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1906

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Novelty Glass Mfg. Co. v. BrookfieldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API