Legal Opinion

Novelty Glass Mfg. Co. v. Brookfield

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 1, 1909No. 6PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey.

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBARD, District Judge.

The patent in suit — or at least the one with which we are particularly concerned — was issued to Seraphin Kribs, July 9, 1895, for a press for making screw insulators for.use on telegraph and other electric lines to support and insulate the wires. These insulators are of glass, with an interior central screw thread impressed upon them while in a molten state, by which they are secured in place on screw pins affixed to the crossarms cf the supporting poles. The patent was sustained and found infringed by Judge Bradford ([C. C.] 134 Fed. 551); and, upon an account…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. St. Louis, Vandalia & Terre Haute Railroad v. Terre Haute & Indianapolis RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Cawood PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Winslow v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1904
  5. Rose v. HirshCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Independent Oil Well Cementing Co. v. HalliburtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  2. Krell Auto Grand Piano Co. v. Story & Clark Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
  3. United Shoe Machinery Corp. v. MutherCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1923
  4. Willard v. Union Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918
  5. Galvin Electric Mfg. Co. v. Emerson Electric Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API