Legal Opinion

Brookfield v. Novelty Glass Mfg. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey

Decided August 15, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the Court

BRADFORD, District Judge.

The bill in this case was filed by William Brookfield, a citizen of New York, against the.Novelty Glass Manufacturing Company, a corporation of New Jersey, charging infringement of letters patent of the United States Nos. 542,565 and 532,973, and containing the usual prayers. Brookfield recently having’ died, the suit is prosecuted by his exécutrix and executors. Both patents were issued to Seraphin Kribs as assignor to Brookfield. Patent No. 542,565' was applied for July 5, 1894, bears date July 9, 1895, and is for “Improvements in Presses for Making…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brookfield v. Elmer GlassworksU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1904
  2. Brookfield v. Elmer Glass WorksU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1906
  3. Brookfield v. Novelty Glass Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1908
  4. Brookfield v. Novelty Glass Meg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1904
  5. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. RosattoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API