Legal Opinion
Brookfield v. Elmer Glass Works
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
Decided March 28, 1906PublishedCited by 3 opinions
In Equity. Suit for infringement of patent. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
TANNING, District Judge.
The complainants allege that the defendant infringes the Kribs patent, No. 542,565, date’d July 9, 1895. In the introductory words to the specification of the patent it is declared that:
“The object of this invention is to provide a press by which the operation of forming insulators for telegraph lines and the like can be rapidly and accurately carried on; and the invention resides in the novel features of construction set forth in the following specification and claims and illustrated in the annexed drawings.”
The specification contains a particular description of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brown v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Grier v. WiltSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Brookfield v. Elmer GlassworksU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1904
- Brookfield v. Novelty Glass Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1903
3Cited by3 opinions
- Novelty Glass Mfg. Co. v. BrookfieldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909
- Brookfield v. Elmer Glass WorksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1907
- Brookfield v. Novelty Glass Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1908