Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. Ingersoll

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1889PublishedCited by 21 opinions

FROM KNOX. Appeal from Chau eery Court of Knox Comity. H. R. GrlBSON, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtSnodgrass, J.

The bill in this cause was filed by J. C. Lawrence, claiming to be a duly elected and qualified member of the Board of Education of the city of Knoxville, for an injunction against defendants — the other four members of said Board— *54to prohibit the meeting and action of said Board without him, and to compel defendants, by mandamus, to recognize him as a member of the Board, and permit him to take part in its proceedings upon allegation of refusal of defendants so to do.

The injunction issued, and, on final hearing, mandamus was awarded as prayed for.

Respondents appealed and assigned errors.

Two…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Richardson v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Virginian Ry. Co. v. SYSTEM FEDERATION NO. 40, ETC.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
  3. Maloney v. CollierTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Adcock v. HoukTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Wooley v. SterrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API