Legal Opinion

Adcock v. Houk

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1909PublishedCited by 17 opinions

FROM KNOX. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Knox County. — ■ Hugh L. McOlung, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

The bill in the present case was filed on June 7, 1909, in the chancery court of Knox county, by the board of *273mayor and aldermen of tlie city of Lonsdale, made such by tbe election held tbe first Thursday in June, 1907, for a term of two years, against the new board elected on tbe first Thursday in June, 1909. Tbe old board was composed of T. J. Adcock, mayor, J. M. Wood, recorder, and Robert Snow, Sam Milwee, Joe Ford, Sam De Armond, Sam Johnson, and F. E. Stanford, aider-men. Tbe new board is composed of M. M. Copenhaver, mayor, W. B. Ailor, recorder, H. E. Cbrisenberry, W. H. Davis, C. L.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Maloney v. CollierTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Lindsay v. AllenTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Baker v. MitchellTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Lawrence v. IngersollTennessee Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. Consolidated Sch. Dist. No. 4 of Iron CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. State Ex Rel. Shriver v. DunnTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State ex rel. Carey v. BrattonTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  4. State ex rel. Brumit v. GrindstaffTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Hogan v. Hamilton CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API