United States v. Julio Hernandez
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
McKEE, Circuit Judge.
Julio Hernandez appeals his conviction for conspiring to obstruct interstate commerce by robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1951(a) and 2, and receiving or possessing goods stolen from commerce in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 659. He argues that the District Court erred in defining reasonable doubt to the jury, in sustaining objections to certain oral statements which defense counsel sought to admit into evidence, and in allowing jurors to ask questions of witnesses. Because we agree that the District Court’s definition of reasonable doubt was likely to…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- United States v. HoffeckerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Commonwealth v. CookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- State v. FisherOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Whitney v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- David Mathias v. Superintendent Frackville SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.