Legal Opinion
Martinez v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided December 11, 2002No. 344-02PublishedCited by 325 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · CochranCochran, J.
in which KELLER, P.J., PRICE, WOMACK, JOHNSON, KEASLER, HERVEY and HOLCOMB, JJ., joined.
The State indicted appellee, Cerjio Martinez, for aggravated perjury based upon the allegedly false content of his written “Sworn Statement to the Grand Jury.” The trial court granted appellee’s motion to suppress that statement because the State did not orally warn Mr. Martinez of his rights under article 20.17 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 1 The State appealed the suppression order, and the court of appeals affirmed. 2 We granted review 3 and hold that the court of appeals correctly declined…
3Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by325 opinions
- Amador v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Pena v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Hacker, Anthony WayneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- State v. HerndonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
320 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.