Gill v. Shimelman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Per curiam
In June, 1974, the plaintiff commissioner of environmental protection, pursuant to General Statutes § 25-54k, ordered the defendant Land Development Company to correct the existing subsurface sewage disposal system serving two tenement buildings in Canton. Almost nine months later, after notice and an opportunity to be heard had been afforded the company under § 25-54o, the parties agreed to the entry of a consent order modifying the original order. The consent order pro vided that the company would reconstruct the sewage system in accordance with an approved plan of a licensed professional…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Corey v. Avco-Lycoming DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. PearsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Town of Windsor v. WhitneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Ackerman v. Union & New Haven Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
- State Ex Rel. Kelman v. SchafferSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sturman v. SochaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Demar v. Open Space & Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Graham v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Bowman v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- LORICCO TOWERS CONDOMINIUM ASS'N v. PantaniConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.