Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Thomson v. Giessel

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1954PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

While in the relief prayed for by the attorney general a peremptory writ of mandamus is sought to compel the respondent to honor the $974,499.40 voucher, we deem the prayer for a declaratory judgment on the questions raised of constitutionality to be determinative of all issues necessary to be considered by us. Such issues are as follows:(1) Is the Wisconsin State Public Building Corporation an agency of instrumentality of the state or is it a private corporation ?(2) If it is a private corporation, do not secs. 14.86 and 14.88, Stats., authorizing its creation, constitute the enactment of a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Attorney General v. DonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State ex rel. Wisconsin Development Authority v. DammannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  3. City of Joliet v. AlexanderIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Rippe v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. Ambrozich v. City of EvelethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hammermill Paper Co. v. La PlanteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. McArthur v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  3. State Ex Rel. Thomson v. GiesselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Application of Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Auth.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. Boe v. FossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API