Legal Opinion · Dissent

Teamey v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 12, 1990No. 89-AB-667; CA A61138Published

1DissentDe Muniz, J.

In Stevenson v. Morgan, 17 Or App 428, 431, 522 P2d 1204 (1974), we characterized the determination of “good *593cause” as a mixed question of fact and law. However, since that time, the Oregon Supreme Court has instructed that we must “separate] the elements of the mixture that are ‘facts’ from those that interpret the law.” McPherson v. Employment Division, 285 Or 541, 547, 591 P2d 1381 (1979).

The reasons that claimant gave for quitting and the events that led up to that decision are questions of fact. McPherson v. Employment Division, supra, 285 Or at 547-48. The term “good cause” in ORS…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. McPherson v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Stevenson v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  4. Londahl v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. Glide Lumber Products Co. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API