Town of Southington v. Pierce
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
The dispositive issue in this case is whether the trial court’s ruling on the plaintiffs’ writ1 of injunction was a final judgment for purposes of appeal to this court. We hold that there was no final judgment and dismiss the appeal.
The underlying litigation arose out of efforts by the named plaintiff, the town of Southington (town), to enforce cease and desist orders directed at the defendants, Mary Pierce and Susan Segal, prohibiting them from using their property for commercial parking purposes. The town, in its complaint, alleged (1) that the subject property is located in a residential…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Doublewal Corp. v. ToffolonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- STRORINEY v. Crescent Lake Tax DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Dewart v. Northeastern Gas Transmission Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Smith v. Otis Elevator Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Mac's Car City, Inc. v. DiLoretoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Brewer v. GutierrezConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Bilik v. Zoning Board of Stamford, No. Cv95 0143334 S (Sep. 4, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996