Legal Opinion

Mac's Car City, Inc. v. DiLoreto

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 30, 1993No. 12373PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendants Pelino DiLoreto and Joanne DiLoreto1 appeal from the summary judgment rendered against them on the plaintiff’s complaint and on their special defenses in this foreclosure action.

In its complaint, the plaintiff sought foreclosure of a judgment lien placed on real estate, possession of the *132premises, attorney’s fees, costs, a receiver of rents and such other relief as the court deemed equitable. In its judgment, the trial court decreed that there was no genuine issue of material fact and that the plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment. The trial court has yet to fix the amount…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. STRORINEY v. Crescent Lake Tax DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. Essex Savings Bank v. FrimbergerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  4. Town of Southington v. PierceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mac's Car City, Inc. v. DiLoretoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. Preston v. Phelps Dodge Copper Products Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  3. Mac's Car City, Inc. v. DiloretoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  4. Cruz v. GonzalezConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  5. City of Danbury v. HoviConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API