Legal Opinion

United States v. True

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided April 27, 1988No. NMCM No. 873657 MPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUBENS, Judge:

This is an appeal by the United States pursuant to Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 862.1 The threshold issue is whether this Court has jurisdiction under Article 62 and Rule for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) 9082 to hear a government appeal of a military judge’s ruling granting a defense motion for employment of an investigative assistant and abating the proceedings when the Government failed to comply. We hold that this ruling is not appealable under Article 62.

Article 62 and R.C.M. 908 authorize the Government to appeal only those orders or rulings…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. United States v. BrowersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  3. United States v. Walter TranowskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. Joseph Fernandes CorreiaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. Robert Joseph Beck. United States of America v. Robert William MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. TrueUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  2. United States v. TrueU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989
  3. United States v. TaylorNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API