Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. True

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided June 23, 1989No. NMCM No. 873657RMPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYRNE, Chief Judge:

This is a government appeal from a military judge’s ruling requiring the convening authority to fund an investigative assistant (a civilian pharmacologist) to provide assistance to the defense in preparing for trial. R. 38, 76. Initially, our Court did not address the issue, as we determined we lacked jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. United States v. True, 26 M.J. 771 (N.M.C.M.R.1988). The United States Court of Military Appeals reversed our decision and returned the record of trial to us for further proceedings. United States v. True, 28 M.J. 1 (C.M.A.1989).…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Carzell Moore v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  3. United States v. GarriesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  4. United States v. MustafaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  5. United States v. TrueUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. AllenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
  2. United States v. TharpeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  3. United States v. TornowskiU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  4. United States v. LangstonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  5. United States v. MannU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API