Legal Opinion

Beinor v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 18, 2011No. 10CA1685PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge RICHMAN.

This unemployment compensation benefits case raises a question of first impression: whether an employee terminated for testing positive for marijuana in violation of an employer's zero-tolerance drug policy may be denied unemployment compensation benefits even if the worker's use of marijuana is "medical use" as defined in article XVIII, section 14 of the Colorado Constitution. We conclude the benefits were properly denied in this case.

Claimant, Jason M. Beinor, appeals the final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) disqualifying him from unemployment…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' CooperativeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Conant v. WaltersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Turbyne v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  4. Colorado Ass'n of Public Employees v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  5. Zaner v. City of BrightonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Braska v. Challenge Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Giuliani v. Jefferson County Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Coats v. Dish Network, L.L.C.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. People v. WatkinsColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Norton v. Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood, IncColorado Court of Appeals · 2016

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API