Legal Opinion

Conant v. Walters

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 29, 2002No. 00-17222PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a permanent injunction entered to protect First Amendment rights. The order enjoins the federal government from either revoking a physician’s license to prescribe controlled substances or conducting an investigation of a physician that might lead to such revocation, where the basis for the government’s action is solely the physician’s professional “recommendation” of the use of medical marijuana. The district court’s order and accompanying opinion are at Conant v. McCaffrey, 2000 WL 1281174 (N.D.Cal. Sept.7, 2000). The history of the litigation…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Kass v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  4. Anthony King v. Federal Bureau of Prisons and Charles GilkeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  5. Dr. Bernd Wollschlaeger v. Governor of the State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API