Legal Opinion

Ternes v. Farmers Union Central Exchange

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1966No. 8306PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEIGEN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from orders of the district court denying the defendants’ motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial.

The action was brought to recover damages which the plaintiff alleges he sustained in the use of lubricating oil, described as Cenex S-l, S.A.E.-30, manufactured by the defendant Farmers Union Central Exchange, and purchased from the defendant Farmers Union Oil Company of Flasher, North Dakota.

In his complaint the plaintiff alleges, in substance, that he purchased the oil for use in his farm machinery, automobiles, and trucks in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stetson v. Investors Oil, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Killmer v. DuchschererNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Vaux v. HamiltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Farmers Home Mutual Insurance v. Grand Forks Implement Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Vick v. FanningNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shark v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Armstrong v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Watkins Products, Inc. v. StadelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Farmers Union Grain Terminal Ass'n v. BrieseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Dehn v. Otter Tail Power Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API