Legal Opinion

Vaux v. Hamilton

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1960No. 7883, 7884PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUTZ, Judge.

The two actions involved in this litigation arose out of a collision of an automobile driven by the plaintiff Vaux, in which the plaintiff Nixon was a passenger, and a Cadillac automobile driven by the defendant Dorothy Hamilton which carried the dealer’s license of the defendant Day’s Auto Brokers, Inc. The accident occurred just west of Jamestown, North Dakota, on U. S. Highway No. 10.

Both actions are against the same defendants and involve the same facts. The cases were consolidated for trial in the district court of Stutsman County, and both cases were argued together on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Leonard v. North Dakota Co-Operative Wool Marketing Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Diemel v. WeirichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Lund Ex Rel. Lund v. KnoffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Posey Ex Rel. Posey v. KroghNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Peterson v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Grenz v. WerreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Parke-Davis and Company, a Corporation v. Shane Stromsodt, a Minor, by Robert M. Stromsodt, His Guardian Ad LitemCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  3. Thornburg v. PerlebergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Nelson v. Trinity Medical CenterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Teegarden v. DahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API