Legal Opinion

Vick v. Fanning

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1964No. 7916PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Judge.

In this action the plaintiff, a farm laborer, sued the defendant, his employer, for damages for injuries he received while operating a farm truck. Issues of the negligence of the defendant, assumption of risk and contributory negligence of the plaintiff were raised by the pleadings and by the evidence adduced in the trial of the case. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. This motion was denied by the trial court and defendant has appealed from the order denying his motion.

The only issues upon…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kingsland v. Erie County Agricultural SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Cameron v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Geier v. TjadenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  5. NEW YORK, C. & ST. L. R. CO. v. AffolderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Gleson v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Lindenberg v. FolsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Wolff v. LightNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Degenstein Ex Rel. Degenstein v. EhrmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Titus v. TitusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API