Legal Opinion
Henz v. United States
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 13, 1949No. 25315-HPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, District Judge.
Libelant brings this libel against the United States, setting forth a cause of action for damages, wages, maintenance and cure under the Suits in Admiralty Act, 46 U.S.C.A. §§ 741-752, the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688, and the Public Vessels Act, 46 U.S.C.A. §§ 781-790.
Subsequent to filing his libel in personam, libelant has moved for discovery of certain documents allegedly taken by and in possession of the United States.
Respondent, following libelant’s motion for discovery, submitted certain exceptions to the libel. In addition respondent opposed, in part, libelant’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- De Bruce v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
- O'NEILL v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- Bank Line v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Certain Parcels of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
- Gebhard v. S.S. Hawaiian LegislatorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Vance W. Williams v. Tide Water Associated Oil Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Mandel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Royal Exchange Assur. v. McGrathDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.