Legal Opinion
Construction Aggregates Corp. v. State
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 2, 1961PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMellitz, J.
In 1955, the defendant was engaged in the construction of the Creenwich-Killingly expressway, now known as the Connecticut turnpike. To obtain fill for use as embankment on the project, the defendant entered into a contract with the plaintiff by which the latter was to supply the required material through dredging operations in Bridgeport harbor. The plaintiff brought this action, pursuant to authorization; 28 Spec. Laws 512, No. 429; to recover a balance alleged to be due for material excavated from the harbor, and damages for losses *317the plaintiff claims to have sustained as a result of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- MacArthur Brothers Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- E. & F. Construction Co. v. Town of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Weston v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Inland Construction Co. v. City of PendletonOregon Supreme Court · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- M. L. Shalloo, Inc. v. Ricciardi & Sons Construction, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- State v. American News Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Maskel Construction Co. v. Town of GlastonburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Gellatly Construction Co. v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- State v. American News Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1964