Legal Opinion

Gellatly Construction Co. v. City of Bridgeport

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 26, 1962PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

The plaintiff, as the successful bidder, was awarded the general contract for the construction and site improvement of the Bridgeport Longfellow elementary school by the city, acting through the board of education. The plaintiff completed its obligations under the contract, the work has been accepted by the city, and the plaintiff has received payment in accordance with the terms of the contract. The plaintiff claims, however, that it is entitled to an additional payment of $28,527.65 to reimburse it for extra expense incurred in removing excess fill from the site. In the present action to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sturtevant v. SturtevantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  2. E. & F. Construction Co. v. Town of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  3. Taft Realty Corp. v. Yorkhaven Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  4. Mahoney v. Hartford Investment CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
  5. Foley v. FoleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Basch v. George Washington UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Blatt v. Star Paper Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  3. Basch v. George Washington UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Fennell v. City of Hartford, No. Cv 89 0370923 (May 1, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API