In Re the Application by the City of Rochester for an Adjustment of Its Service Area Boundaries With Peoples Cooperative Power Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
FACTS
The City of Rochester (city) filed a petition with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (PUC), requesting a determination of the appropriate compensation to be paid to Peoples Cooperative Power Association (Peoples) for the city’s acquisition of Peoples’ assigned service area.
A contested case hearing was scheduled. Relator Dairyland Power Cooperative, which supplies wholesale power to Peoples and 27 of Dairyland’s member distribution cooperatives, petitioned to intervene in the proceedings. The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) denied the petition…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Board of Registration for Architects, Engineers, & Land Surveyors v. GetsugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Norman v. RefslandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Thibault v. BostromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- County of Ramsey v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Overseas Commodities Corp., Inc. v. DockmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gun Lake Ass'n v. County of AitkinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- In the Matter of the Complaint of Troy Scheffler Regarding the Committee to Elect Josh HeintzemanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2026