Legal Opinion

In re the Proposed Termination of Volz

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 22, 1989No. CO-89-1290PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH, Justice.

We granted the petition of Jeanne Volz for further review of an order of the court of appeals discharging the writ of certiora-ri. We reverse and remand.

At issue is an interpretation of Minn. Stat. § 606.03 (1988) which provides:

Each writ of certiorari in a civil case shall be endorsed by some responsible person as surety for costs.

Specifically, the writ issued herein was not itself endorsed but was accompanied by a separate endorsement of an individual as surety for costs. The requisite costs were properly paid. Relying on its own decision, In re Complaint Regarding Annexation…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. CIVIL SERVICE COM'N OF CITY OF MINNEAPOLISSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. In Re Complaint Regarding the Annexation of a Portion of the Service Territory of Peoples Cooperative Power Ass'n by the City of RochesterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Proposed Placement on Unrequested Leave of BristolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API