Legal Opinion

McQueen v. United States

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided November 19, 2019No. 1:17-cv-01149Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DAVID WILSON McQUEEN, Movant, Case No. 1:17-CV-1149 v. (Criminal Case No. 1:11:CR:335) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HON. GORDON J. QUIST Respondent. _____________________/ OPINION REGARDING McQUEEN’S § 2255 MOTION Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, David Wilson McQueen moves to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. (ECF No. 1.) McQueen claims that he was denied effective assistance of counsel in the pre-trial, trial, sentencing, and appellate phases of his case. Because “the motion and the files and records of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API