Legal Opinion

Tze Hao Yen v. Ramos

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 17, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*504OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Order dated July 25, 1997 reversed, with $10 costs, motion denied and petition reinstated.

The notice of nonrenewal underlying this “owner use” holdover proceeding informed the tenant that one of the named landlords (Lin) “desires occupy [sic] for her own use and residence,” and further explained that “Ms. Lin formerly resided at 1702 Church Avenue, Brooklyn, New York in a studio apartment and managed a Laundromat on the ground floor. Her studio apartment went with the business which she managed at that time. The Laundromat business was placed on the market for sale in…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Berkeley Associates Co. v. CamlakidesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Berkeley Associates Co. v. CamlakidesNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Teichman v. CiapiAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1994

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Giancola v. MiddletonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API