Legal Opinion

Wood v. Dunn

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 9, 1991No. WCB Nos. 89-05827, 89-05826, 89-03292, 89-16769; CA A66933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Herwood, a partnership of Mike Hermeling and Frank Stanley Wood, seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that it is a noncomplying employer and that claimant is entitled to benefits for a compensable injury.1

Herwood contracted with claimant to do several jobs on buildings that it owned. Claimant hired several workers to assist him in the Herwood job and paid them on an hourly basis. He gave a statement to Herwood accepting responsibility for his workers in the event of an accident. He had no workers’ compensation insurance, and neither did Herwood.

In the course of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bauman v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Woody v. WaibelOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Castle Homes, Inc. v. WhaiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. Clark v. LinnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. Bisbey v. ThedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. K-Mart Corp. v. ClaussingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Liberty Northwest Insurance v. SparksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API