Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Barby

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 24, 1961No. 38990PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Justice.

On December 8, 1958, plaintiff in error, Lawrence A. Curtis, also known as L. A. Curtis, commenced proceedings to quiet title to an undivided one-fourth interest in the minerals in and under properties located in Beaver County, Oklahoma. Defendants filed a general denial and a cross-petition to quiet their title to the minerals. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment quieting title to the minerals in favor of the defendants. The parties will be referred to by name or their trial court designation.

The controlling issue involved is the validity of a judgment against L. A. Curtis…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Independent Cotton Oil Co. v. BeachamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Coats v. RileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Vinson v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Noble v. KahnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. Engle v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mendes v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Harry R. Carlile Trust v. Cotton Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Horath v. PierceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  4. Skillman v. SkillmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  5. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. of NY v. PenickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API