State v. Fees
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
EISMANN, Justice.
The district court held that a telephonic search warrant was invalid because the magistrate judge did not sign an original of the warrant when he authorized a peace officer to affix the magistrate’s signature to a duplicate original of the warrant. The district court also held that a warrantless entry into a residence to preserve evidence of the felony crime of trafficking in marijuana was invalid because it was done before the search warrant hearing and to preserve evidence of a nonviolent crime. The State appealed, and we hold that the district court erred in granting the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Segura v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. AdamcikIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- Rideout v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. TrudelleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. RobinsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.