Legal Opinion

State v. Fees

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 2004No. 29421PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

The district court held that a telephonic search warrant was invalid because the magistrate judge did not sign an original of the warrant when he authorized a peace officer to affix the magistrate’s signature to a duplicate original of the warrant. The district court also held that a warrantless entry into a residence to preserve evidence of the felony crime of trafficking in marijuana was invalid because it was done before the search warrant hearing and to preserve evidence of a nonviolent crime. The State appealed, and we hold that the district court erred in granting the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Segura v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. AdamcikIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Rideout v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. TrudelleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. RobinsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API