Legal Opinion

State v. Trudelle

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 2007No. 25,476PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUSTAMANTE, Judge.

{1} This case requires us to determine whether the district court erred in suppressing evidence obtained pursuant to a warrant based in part on unlawfully acquired information. More specifically, we address whether the issuing judge preserved the warrant’s validity by making a handwritten note that he found probable cause for the warrant to issue even without considering the tainted information. We follow our decision in State v. Wagoner, 2001-NMCA-014, 130 N.M. 274, 24 P.3d 306 [hereinafter Wagoner II], and conclude that the warrant was invalid. Accordingly, we…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. FloresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. State v. TrudelleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. MooreNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State v. YazzieNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. TapiaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API