Legal Opinion

Coley v. North Carolina Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 7, 1901PublishedCited by 36 opinions

ActioN by Samuel S. Coley against the North Carolina Railroad Company, beard by Judge W. A. Hoke and a jury, at February Term, 1900, of the Superior Court of Wake County. From a judgment for the plaintiff, the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY and COOK, J. J., dissenting. This is an action for injuries by the defendant road. In the case it is stated that the defendant, North Carolina Railroad, had been leased to the Southern before the injury complained of was received, and that the Southern was in possession and operating the same at that time. But (535) as no point was made as to this fact on the trial of the case, nor on appeal, we will give it no further attention.

The plaintiff was an experienced railroad man, having been engaged in railroad work for more than twenty years, and had been in the employ of the defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pickett v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Greenlee v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. Hudson v. Charleston, Cincinnati & Chicago RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  4. Cowles v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  5. Pleasants v. Raleigh & Augusta Air-Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Coley v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HoffmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Biles v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Boney v. Atlantic & North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1907

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API