Legal Opinion

Greenlee v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 26, 1898PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAIRCLOTH, C. J., and FURCHES, J., dissent. In any aspect of this case the defendant is liable, whether the plaintiff was or was not guilty of contributory negligence, for the negligence of the defendant in not having self-couplers, and in sending a man to couple cars at all was a continuing negligence which existed subsequent to the contributory negligence, if there had been any, of the plaintiff, and was the proximate cause, the causa causans of the injury.

Six years ago (1892) in Mason v. R. R., 111 N.C. 482, at page 487, the Court, in considering "whether the defendant company was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mason v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  2. Witsell v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Davis Coal Co. v. PollandIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Hall v. West & Slade Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Jenney Electric Manufacturing Co. v. FlanneryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Coley v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API