Legal Opinion

Cowles v. Richmond & Danville Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1881PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Civil Action for damages tried at August Special Term, 1880, of Rowan Superior Court, before McKoy, J. Judgment for plaintiff, appeal by defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtRuffiN, J.

The plaintiff alleges that he was a brakes-man on the defendant’s road, and that lie was injured by having his foot-and ankle crushed while in its service and by reason of its negligence. On the trial he testified that he was under the immediate direction and order of one Garrison, who was the engineer and conductor of the defendant’s freight train, and on the occasion of the injuries received was ordered by him to go upon a certain car and apply the brake, so as to prevent a clash between that car and another; that he went upon, the car, and while executing the order given him was injured in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Gibson v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  3. Crutchfield v. Richmond & Danville Rail-RoadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  4. Johnson v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Mason v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  2. Madden's Adm'r v. C. & O. Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Coley v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  4. Grattis v. Kansas City, Pittsburg & Gulf RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  5. Patton v. Western North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API