Legal Opinion
Chisholm v. Davis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 31, 1940No. 32,357PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
The employe was awarded compensation, and the employer brings certiorari to review the decision.
The employe was a tenant of an apartment in one of the employer’s apartment buildings. The employer owned a duplex and two fourplex buildings in which there were residential accommodations for ten families and also a store building, all situated in the residential portion of Minneapolis.
The employer operates a haberdashery business in the downtown portion of the city. He devotes all of his time to this business. The buildings, which he rents, are low rental properties. The monthly…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gaynor's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- O'Rourke v. Percy Vittum Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Hoard v. Sears Roebuck Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- State ex rel. City of Northfield v. District Court of Rice CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Billmayer v. SanfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Farnam v. Linden Hills Congregational ChurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Amundsen v. PoppeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Koktavy v. City of New PragueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Kolbeck v. MyhraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Byhardt v. BallordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.