Legal Opinion
Pennsylvania R. Co. v. City of Louisville
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided March 14, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Cammack
Affirming.
The City of Louisville, Kentucky, and Roy W. Burks, Director of Works of the City of Louisville, filed suit under the Declaratory Judgment Act, sections 639a — 1 to 639a — 12, inclusive, of the Civil Code of Practice, against the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, the Louisville Bridge & Terminal Company, a subsidiary, of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, the Illinois Central Railroad Company, the Chicago, St. Louis & New Orleans Railroad Company, a subsidiary of the Illinois Central Railroad. Company, and the Louisville Railway Company, seeking,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- McKnight v. Broadway Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Schmidtz v. L. & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
- Kansas City v. Kansas City Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. City of BellevueCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- London Bucket Co. v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
- London Bucket Co. v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951