Legal Opinion

Schmidtz v. L. & N. R. R.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 15, 1897PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Case 75 — PETITION EQUITY

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE GUFFY

delivered the opinion of the court.

This action was brought in the Shelby Circuit Court by appellant, Schmidtz, Trustee, and the Northern Division of the Cumberland & Ohio Railroad Company, against the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, etc., to' compel said Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company by mandatory injunction to continue to operate the northern division of the Cumberland & Ohio Railroad Company from Shelby-ville to Bloomfield in accordance with a lease and contract set out in the petition.

It appeal's from the allegations of the petition that the northern division…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Joy v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Marble Co. v. RipleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Wiggins Ferry Co. v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Railway Co. v. AllingSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Texas Co. v. Central Fuel Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  2. Taylor v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1907
  3. Callan Court Co. v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  4. McKnight v. Broadway Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  5. Edelen v. Samuels & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API