Legal Opinion
Maryland Casualty Co. v. F. B. Hunter & Co
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided July 31, 1928PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiskell, J.
This is a suit by the Maryland Casualty Company to recover from Frank B. Hunter & Company, Incorporated, $1985 upon the theory that complainant sustained this loss by reason of the conduct of the defendant while acting as its agent in regard to a certain policy of burglary insurance.
The bill charged that the complainant, Maryland Casualty Company, was engaged in the insurance business in the State of Tennessee, and that the defendant Frank B. Hunter & Company, Incorporated, was a duly licensed insurance agent and broker in the State of Tennessee; that in December, 1920, J. L. McTyier applied…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Winne v. . Niagara Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Scottish Union & National Insurance v. Andrews & MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
- Norwood v. Alamo Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Lee v. First National BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
- Condon v. Exton-Hall Brokerage & Vessel AgencyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- TH Hayes & Sons v. Stuyvesant Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1952
- Virginia Surety Co. v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
- Shelby Mutual Insurance Company v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
- Mark Hannah and James F. Forester v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Fesmire v. MFA Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.