Condon v. Exton-Hall Brokerage & Vessel Agency
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York, entered in favor of the plaintiff for $2,158.24, after a trial before the court without a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtSeabuby, J.
Plaintiff, as assignee of four insurance companies, sues for damages for defendant’s failure to cancel a certain policy of fire insurance, is*131sued by the aforesaid companies upon a certain vessel, the property of one C. O. Walshingham.
The defendant, on behalf of C. 0. Walsingham, applied to plaintiff’s assignors for a policy of fire insurance on a boat owned by Walsingham, and the plaintiff’s assignors issued a policy thereon for $2,000. The policy was in the New York standard form and contained the standard cancellation clause, as follows: “ This policy shall be cancelled at any time at the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Home Mutual Insurance v. Broadway Bank & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1979
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. F. B. Hunter & CoCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
- Condon v. Exton Hall Brokerage & Vessel AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Williams v. Balzano, New York County Courts1935