Legal Opinion

Mark Hannah and James F. Forester v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 22, 1968No. 17751PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCREE, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by State Farm Mutual Insurance Company from a judgment of the District Court reinstating a jury verdict in favor of Mark Hannah and James F. Forester, appellees herein. The facts as recited by the District Court in its opinion of July 12, 1966 are adopted. Mark Hannah, one of the two appellees in this case, made application for an automobile liability insurance policy under the provisions of the Tennessee Assigned Risk Plan, hereinafter referred to as “the Assigned Risk Plan” or “the Plan”. The risk was assigned to the appellant, State Farm. A policy…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Matsuo Yoshida and Chisato Yoshida v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  3. Continental Insurance v. RuckmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Pollock v. German Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Schomer v. Hekla Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Knox-Tenn Rental Company and Robert C. Lowe v. The Home Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  3. Employers Casualty Company v. MirelesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Pearson v. Selected Risks Insurance CompanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  5. Driver v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API