State v. Hibbard

*337EDMONDS, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for telephonic harassment, ORS 166.090(l)(a), arguing that the trial court erred by denying his motions for directed verdict and for judgment of acquittal. We affirm.

On one day, defendant placed four telephone calls to the 9-1-1 emergency service in Clackamas County. During the first phone call, after the operator answered, defendant initially said, ‘ ‘Huh?” During the second call, he used profane language. When the 9-1-1 operator called back defendant to make sure that he was not in danger, defendant threatened to kill any police who might come to…