Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 25, 1989No. 88C-11692; CA A60685PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

SAIF Corporation appeals from a judgment for the defendant Workers’ Compensation referee in this mandamus action by which SAIF seeks to have defendant compelled to vacate his order on a claim. The trial court concluded that exclusive jurisdiction to review defendant’s order is provided in the Workers’ Compensation Law and that the availability of that review provides SAIF with an adequate alternative remedy and therefore makes mandamus unavailable. The court entered a judgment dismissing the alternative writ. We affirm.

The claimant had requested review of four determination orders that were…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Automotive Emporium, Inc. v. MurchisonOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. STATE EX REL. HUNTINGTON, ETC. v. SulmonettiOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. State ex rel. Automobile Emporium, Inc. v. MurchisonOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State Ex. Rel. Handly v. HieberOregon Supreme Court · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Speciality Risk Services v. Royal Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. Gordineer v. BellottiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. Olsten Temporary Services, Inc. v. LiptonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API