Legal Opinion

Olsten Temporary Services, Inc. v. Lipton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 12, 1990No. A8904-02174; CA A60945Published

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

In this mandamus proceeding, defendant, a workers’ compensation referee, appeals from the circuit court’s judgment and issuance of a peremptory writ ordering him to suspend the hearing rights of a workers’ compensation claimant. We reverse, because we conclude that there is no factual predicate for the writ. It should not have been issued.

The claimant sustained a compensable back injury in February, 1987, while employed by plaintiff Olsten Temporary Services, Inc. The claim was closed by a determination order in September, 1987. In April, 1988, the claimant settled an aggravation claim,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Automotive Emporium, Inc. v. MurchisonOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. STATE EX REL. HUNTINGTON, ETC. v. SulmonettiOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State Ex Rel. LeVasseur v. MertenOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Dinsdale v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. SAIF Corp. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API