Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 11, 1961No. C.D. 2229PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Laweence, Judge:

An importation of three Berthelsen presses and parts thereof from Denmark was classified by the collector of customs as articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, and parts thereof, within the purview of paragraph 353 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1001, par. 353), as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T.D. 52739, and assessed with duty at the rate of 13% per centum ad valorem.

It is the claim of plaintiff herein that the importations should properly have been classified as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Simon, Buhler & Baumann (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  2. Jensen v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  3. Baker Perkins, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Keer, Maurer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  2. Arnhold Ceramics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Rembar Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. Consolidated International Equipment & Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  5. F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API