Consolidated International Equipment & Supply Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
FoRD, Judge:
This action is brought to determine whether the classification and appraisement of certain paper cutters were proper. The merchandise was classified by the collector of customs as articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device under the provisions of paragraph 353 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T.D. 52739, and assessed with duty at the rate of 13% per centum ad valorem.
Plaintiff, by its protest and oral amendment thereto, claims that the so-called electrical…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Keer, Maurer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- Sullivan v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
- Henry A. Wess, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
- Holmes v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
3Cited by6 opinions
- Miller v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Staalkat of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Castelazo v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Consolidated International Equipment & Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Consolidated International Equipment & Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.