Legal Opinion

Jensen v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 11, 1950No. C. D. 1258PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, Judge:

Certain filter press plates and frames imported from Canada were classified by the collector of customs as “Articles or wares not specially provided for, * * * if composed wholly or in chief value of iron, steel, * * * or other metal” within the scope of paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 397) and duty thereon was accordingly assessed at the rate of 45 per centum ad valorem.

It is the plaintiffs’ sole contention that the importation should have been assessed with duty at 27K per centum ad valorem as “parts” of machines, finished or unfinished, not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Simon, Buhler & Baumann (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. Green Fuel Economizer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Owens-Illinois Glass Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  4. William H. Masson, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API