Legal Opinion

Howell v. Flora

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 11, 1942No. 35,581PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allen, J.:

This was an action on a promissory note. The petition alleged:

“2. That on or about the 28th day of October, 1933, the defendants, E. N. Flora, and Ethelinda Flora, his wife, did then and there make, execute and deliver to the Quinter State Bank, Quinter, Kansas, their certain promissory note, in writing, whereby, for value received, the said defendants then and there promised to pay to the said The Quinter State Bank, Quinter, Kansas, the sum of eighteen hundred forty-six and 59/100 dollars on or before four months after the date thereof,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Nelson v. SchippelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. Manley v. ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Fipps v. StidhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Muckenthaler v. NollerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  5. Gay v. First Nat. BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lessley v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  2. First National Bank of Topeka v. United Telephone Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. Hill v. HaysSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  4. Doman Hunting & Fishing Ass'n v. DomanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  5. Hot Springs National Bank v. StoopsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API