Legal Opinion

Muckenthaler v. Noller

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 12, 1919No. 21,955PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from Wabaunsee district court; Robert C. Heizer, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

The plaintiffs sue for contribution, alleging that, together with the defendants, they executed a promissory note which they were compelled to pay. The plaintiffs recovered, and the defendants appeal.

• The petition alleged that L. Palenské and his wife were indebted to the Commercial National Bank of Alma, on a promissory note which they were unable to pay when it matured, and that on the 27th day of January, 1913, the plaintiffs, together with defendants, executed and delivered their promissory note, due in one year, for $4,000, payable to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Williams v. NeelyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  2. Groesbeck v. SeeleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Baker v. KelleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866
  4. Eureka Bank v. BaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. Walker v. BohSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Beachy v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  2. Rochester American Insurance v. Cassell Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  3. Collins v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  4. Howell v. FloraSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  5. Conner v. Koch Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API